After Iran, the eternal Russo

In Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the body of experts in international politics knows exactly what to say – but not quite what to think. These experts can always rely on a series of nationalist and messianic clichés making Russia the eternal adversary of all forms of global hegemony, but their voices are increasingly discordant, risking contradiction from one month to the next when analyzing the ever-changing international policy of Donald Trump’s United States.

Context: The article discusses the changing dynamics between Russia and the United States under the leadership of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.

Since military interventions in Venezuela and Iran, it is clear that the harmony claimed by Vladimir Putin between the United States and Russia has dissipated. Simultaneously, a significant part of Kremlin rhetoric and its advocates has collapsed.

For months, Russian publications assured the public that the United States had returned to reason, focusing on internal fractures rather than international affairs. However, with events in Caracas and Tehran, it is evident that these speeches were either wishful thinking or mere diplomatic tactics.

Fact Check: The article questions the previous harmonious relationship claimed by Vladimir Putin between Russia and the United States, highlighting recent events in Venezuela and Iran as evidence of a change in dynamics.

According to Dmitri Trenin, a recent publication in the Russian weekly magazine Profl, expert analysis shows that Donald Trump’s intention is to engage in regime change, leading to the conclusion that Russia must prepare for a lasting confrontation with the United States.

Trenin’s intervention stands out for its realistic and pragmatic tone. Where propaganda focuses on a declining Western collective and rising powers like China and BRICS, Trenin emphasizes the enduring power of the United States.

Fact Check: The article discusses how Russian experts are warning about the challenges posed by Donald Trump’s policies and the need for Russia to prepare for a long-term confrontation with the United States.

Trump’s historic role and intentions have shifted, focusing on nationalist and pragmatic approaches, departing from his initial vision of restoring America’s greatness.

Context: The article explores the evolving nature of Trump’s policies and the implications for Russia-US relations, emphasizing the need for Russia to remain prepared for potential conflict.

Overall, the content discusses the changing dynamics between Russia and the United States under the leadership of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. It highlights the shifting narratives, the implications of recent events in Venezuela and Iran, and the potential for future conflict between the two nations.