After the exfiltration of Nicolás Maduro by an elite unit from the United States, the question was whether we would witness a democratic transition in Venezuela. Three months later, the risk that seems to be looming is that of the consolidation of a sort of 21st century colonialism. A collateral damage (or not) of the Donroe doctrine, a Trumpian version of the Monroe doctrine [which views Latin America as the backyard of the United States].
The current political model aims for economic efficiency, limited tolerance towards certain dissidents, the reduction – not elimination – of the repressive bureaucracy, and the shaping of an “ideal” opposition, rooted in the democratic tradition but lacking the real ability to challenge power in the short term.
Based on this framework, it is possible to create a perfect dictatorship, as described by authors like the American political scientist Steven Levitsky, while introducing innovations. Thus, the regime has the explicit or tacit approval of a power that has not yet clearly defined its roadmap towards a democratic transition. It is safe to say that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Fact Check:
– Nicolás Maduro is indeed the former President of Venezuela. – The Monroe Doctrine is a real policy stance by the United States in the early 19th century. – Steven Levitsky is a known political scientist.
Context: This article discusses the potential risk of a modern form of colonialism and the development of a perfect dictatorship in Venezuela following recent events involving Nicolás Maduro.
