Imported Article – 2026-04-18 12:16:37

After several days of uncertainty, the migration agreement concluded in early April 2026 between Washington and Kinshasa has entered its operational phase. In the night of April 16 to 17, fifteen migrants were transferred to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

This first group marks the beginning of a system that will continue, with monthly arrivals potentially reaching up to fifty people.

Upon their arrival at Ndjili Airport, seven women and eight men were taken in. According to a source close to the presidency, these migrants are originally from Peru and Ecuador, integrated into a transfer mechanism operated by the United States.

To handle this arrival, authorities have requested assistance from the International Organization for Migration.

“The government of the DRC has asked the IOM to provide humanitarian assistance to the 15 migrants sent back by the United States to the DRC,” the agency stated, adding that they could offer “assisted voluntary return to migrants who request it.”

In a statement from the Congolese Ministry of Communication and Media, it was mentioned that the welcoming system for these migrants put in place by the government is “strictly transitional, temporary, and time-limited. It does not constitute a mechanism for sustainable settlement in the national territory, nor a permanent relocation,” the statement continues.

An opaque agreement with broader implications Amid the controversy generated by this agreement, the Congolese Ministry of Communication announced in early April the establishment of “a temporary reception system for nationals from third countries under US migration mechanisms.”

Kinshasa remains discreet about the details of the agreement, while assuring that “the logistical and technical support of the system will be provided by the American government” and that “no financial burden will be borne by the public treasury.”

In the background, this arrangement fits into a strategic context, particularly around access to Congolese mineral resources, crucial for the global industry.

Criticism regarding human rights Human Rights Watch denounces “opaque” agreements and believes that these expulsions could “violate international law.”

This initial operation, despite official announcements, still raises many questions.