The Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, Theophilos III, met with US President Donald Trump in Washington on June 4. According to the official press release from the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, this visit was aimed at defending the Christian presence in the Middle East, freedom of worship and access to holy places.
He also mentioned “the pastoral mission of the Church, focused on mercy and building peace” and invited President Trump to visit the site of Christ’s baptism in Jordan. It is rumored that the United States Embassy in Israel is indeed studying the possibility of an official trip by the president to Israel in September.
The Patriarch also presented the American President with the Grand Cross of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, one of the highest distinctions granted by the Patriarchate of Jerusalem. The gesture is highly symbolic. It comes at a time when the Churches of the Holy Land have been denouncing for several years the growing difficulties faced by Christians in the region: restrictions on access to holy places, violence against religious people, pressures linked to conflicts and the continued weakening of local Christian communities.
Read also → Church leaders appeal to the diplomatic corps of Jerusalem
In its press release, the Patriarchate emphasizes that the discussions focused on the preservation of the “status quo” of holy places, the defense of human dignity and the promotion of peace. His Beatitude Theophilos III notably mentioned the restrictions which recently affected access to the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, as well as the difficulties encountered by the faithful Muslims and Christians to practice their worship. He also praised the role of King Abdullah II in protecting the holy places and the Christian presence in the Holy Land.
An Israeli reading focused on recent tensions
The Israeli press widely reported the meeting, but with a different angle from that of the official press release.
The daily Haaretz insisted on the context of tensions between the Israeli authorities and the Churches. The newspaper recalls several incidents which aroused strong emotion in the Christian world: the restrictions imposed during the Palm Sunday celebrations in March 2026, the attack which affected the Church of the Holy Family in Gaza in July 2025 or the fire which occurred near the Church of Khader (Saint George) in Taybeh. For the daily, the patriarch’s approach is part of a climate of growing concern regarding the security and religious freedom of Christians in the Middle East.
Read also →  Christians of the Holy Land: two patriarchs, one voice
The Ynetnews site places particular emphasis on the historical role of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem, guardian of numerous Christian holy sites, as well as on the international dimension of the patriarch’s journey, presented as a major figure in world Orthodoxy.
For its part, The Times of Israel mainly focuses on the call addressed to Donald Trump to guarantee access to holy sites and protect Christian communities. The media also highlights recent controversies linked to restrictions imposed during the war with Iran and incidents targeting Christians in Jerusalem.
A distinction that questions
Beyond the press comments, the presentation of the highest distinction of the Patriarchate to Donald Trump also raises questions among certain Palestinian Christians.
One of them publicly expressed his discomfort in a short text broadcast after the meeting. Without calling into question the legitimacy of the Patriarchate’s diplomatic relations, he recalls that honorary distinctions are never neutral. “The honors have a deep symbolic value,” he writes. They express not only the people we choose to honor, but also the values we wish to put forward.
In the current context of war and human suffering, this Palestinian Christian asks a simple question: should the highest distinctions reward power and influence, or the defense of justice, human dignity and peace? He concludes by quoting the Beatitudes: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God” (Mt 5:9).
This question illustrates the delicate balance facing the Churches of Jerusalem. Anxious to dialogue with political leaders capable of influencing the destiny of Christians in the East, they must also respond to the expectations of the faithful marked by war and an ever more fragile regional situation.
