While he claims not to like this system, Claude Puel has just used it three times in the last four outings of OGC Nice. Constrained by a squad built in this direction? Or convinced by the formula? A five-man defense seems most suitable for this final sprint.
One must always be wary of what Claude Puel says in press conferences and sometimes understand the opposite of his long demonstrations. The man from Béarn likes to confuse the issue and hide his game. For example, indicating that there would be no return for the match against Paris before finally calling up three players who were absent in Angers. Same with defense. Puel assures us, eye to eye, that he does not want to play with 5 in the back. That it is a system that removes a forward or midfielder.
Except that he has just lined up this system 3 times in the last 4 matches. With more success against Lorient and Angers. Much less against Paris, even if the quality of the opponent nuances any conclusions about the effectiveness of this system that seems to match the qualities of a squad built to play with 5 under Franck Haise. Puel often repeats that he has 8 central defenders for 3 spots and Dante’s lack of speed is better compensated with two other fast center-backs around him like Mendy and Bah. Clauss is also well-suited for this right wing-back position to animate a flank where no winger has stood out.
So, strengthen the middle with three hardworking midfielders and two center forwards. As against PSG. Even if Diop had a lot of freedom and little inspiration up front. One can imagine Cho accompanying Wahi after the break and in the final sprint. Boudache as a joker. Vanhoutte and Youssouf competing for the 3rd spot in midfield alongside Sanson and Boudaoui. And you probably have the team that should secure survival and a first title in 29 years! Even if Puel can also decide to change everything just to prove us wrong…

/2026/03/29/69c973a91a4b8065759989.jpg)




