The blockage of the Strait of Hormuz threatens to trigger a global food crisis affecting an additional 45 million people. The UN is warning of the urgency of reopening this crucial sea route for fertilizer supplies, with a critical deadline set for May 15.
UN warns of possible global food crisis linked to Hormuz blockade
The Strait of Hormuz, this thirty-three kilometer maritime passage which hugs the waters of the Persian Gulf, today crystallizes the concerns of the entire planet. Its partial blockage, which has lasted for several weeks, poses the threat of afood crisisOn an unprecedented scale, likely to affect forty-five million additional people around the world.
“My urgent appeal is that negotiations continue until a diplomatic solution is found, the ceasefire is maintained and, in the meantime, the Strait of Hormuz remains fully open,” urged António Guterres, Secretary-General of the UN, from Nairobi. The head of the international organization insists that “any resumption of fighting would have terrible consequences”.
The Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery of the global food economy
To fully understand the extent of this threat, it is necessary to examine the critical role that this maritime passage plays in the planetary economy. Far from being a simple oil corridor, the Strait of Hormuz stands out as an irreplaceable link in the global food chain.
Thirteen percent of African imports pass through this strategic artery, loading mainly oil and fertilizers. Even more precisely,a third of all fertilizers transported by sea takes this route, according to statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). This geographic concentration creates a formidable systemic vulnerability for global agricultural production.
Chemical fertilizers – urea, ammonia, sulfur – constitute the backbone of contemporary agriculture. Deprived of these vital inputs, yields collapse with relentless brutality. Academic work establishes that synthetic fertilizers, resulting from the Haber-Bosch process, nourish nearly half of today’s humanity.
Soaring prices and time urgency
The economic repercussions are already unfolding with unprecedented violence. The price of urea, one of the most widely used nitrogen fertilizers in the world, has risen by more than thirty-five percent in the space of a month. This surge occurs at the heart of the planting season, a crucial period when farmers cannot postpone their acquisition of inputs.
“Currently, the price of urea has jumped by more than 35% in the space of a month, and this is in the middle of the planting season,” laments António Guterres. This inflation of agricultural costs spreads inexorably towards final food prices, triggering a particularly devastating domino effect for the poorest populations.
The temporal emergency gives this economic equation a dramatic dimension. Agricultural cycles do not suffer any delay: “Agriculture has its calendar which cannot be modified or postponed”, recall the UN experts. May 15 is shaping up to be a fateful deadline for the delivery of fertilizers intended for this year’s crops.
UN alert: 45 million people at risk
Faced with this alarming situation, the UN formed a working group at the end of March specifically dedicated to unblocking the strait. Jorge Moreira da Silva, who leads this initiative, draws up an implacable observation: “When the crisis broke out, we knew that a few countries would be affected, particularly in Africa and South-East Asia. Today the situation is much worse, because the entire fertilizer market is disrupted.”
L’organisation internationale évalue que forty-five million additional people could fall into acute food insecurity if the situation continues. This projection is based on models integrating incompressible delivery times and the nutritional needs of essential food crops.
Sub-Saharan Africa is on the front line of these concerns. The poorest nations in the Sahel and the Horn of Africa, where planting traditionally begins in June, have a dramatically reduced window for action. “Without fertilizer, you can imagine that we risk facing a serious food security problem next year,” warns the UN Secretary-General.
Analysis of systemic risks and perspectives
Thisfood crisis potential exposes the gaping flaws in our globalized supply systems. The growing interdependence of economies, which generates efficiency in normal times, also generates major systemic vulnerabilities during geopolitical tensions. This situation echoes growing concerns around global insolvency, which is redefining our relationship with resources.
Scientists are also warning of an aggravating factor: the planet risks being hit this year by an El Niño phenomenon of exceptional magnitude, synonymous with extreme heat and drought. This conjunction of climatic and geopolitical factors could transform a supply crisis into a humanitarian catastrophe, revealing once again the interconnections between ecological and human crises.
According to FAO projections, certain cereal yields – maize, rice, peanuts, sorghum – could be halved from this summer if the blockage continues. This perspective justifies the urgency of the appeals launched by the international community.
Emergency solutions and implications for businesses
Faced with this emergency, the UN is proposing concrete solutions. “We would need on average five ships per day. It’s a simple mechanism from a logistical point of view,” explains Jorge Moreira da Silva. The organization has the necessary expertise and could deploy a humanitarian corridor in seven days. “So, we’re ready. What is missing is political will,” he says with bitterness.
This situation directly challenges business leaders on the resilience of their supply chains. The lessons of this crisis underline the crucial importance of geographical diversification of supply sources and the constitution of strategic reserves.
For players in the agri-food industry, this alert constitutes a powerful signal to rethink their supply strategies. Excessive dependence on unique strategic maritime passages represents a major commercial risk, likely to have a lasting impact on profitability and operational continuity. Companies must now consider diversifying their sources of supply of fertilizers and agricultural inputs, building up strategic stocks for critical periods, developing partnerships with local and regional suppliers, investing in agricultural technologies that are less dependent on chemical inputs, as well as strengthening geopolitical monitoring systems and economical.
The humanitarian alternative, if it were to prevail, would represent a colossal cost. A large-scale food aid operation would require several billion dollars, according to UN estimates. This economic perspective strengthens the argument for a quick diplomatic solution.
This crisis also reveals the growing interdependence between geopolitics and global food security. Companies in the agri-food sector must now integrate these geostrategic parameters into their risk analyzes and business continuity plans. The issue goes far beyond simple supply: it is about guaranteeing the stability of markets and the food security of populations, responsibilities shared between states and private economic players.



/2026/05/12/6a02bf7d836fa759862486.jpg)
