A new controversy has emerged in the Swiss army, this time regarding handguns. The pistols selected by Armasuisse received very low scores during tests, according to information obtained by Watson through transparency laws.
The model in question, the Sig Sauer P320, scored 1 out of 10, the lowest possible, in target shooting tests, according to Watson. Despite this, the Confederation plans to acquire 50,000 units for 50 million francs, with additional orders expected in the future. Two more batches are set to follow.
Tests conducted by the Swiss army revealed several problems: a slide that does not always close automatically, a handle deemed uncomfortable causing wrist pain for some soldiers, and at times an ineffective sighting system.
Subjective Criteria According to Armasuisse
These criticisms are not entirely new, but the detailed test results shed new light. They raise questions especially since the American model was preferred over two European competitors, with the Austrian Glock scoring 7 out of 10.
Armasuisse clarified that “these assessments are based on subjective criteria such as handling and ergonomics, and do not reflect the technical safety or functionality of the weapon.”
A Strategic and Industrial Choice
Despite these results, the choice of Sig Sauer aligns with the Federal Council’s armament policy, as indicated by Armasuisse. The government aims to strengthen the Swiss armament industry for economic and security independence reasons.
The weapons are expected to be produced in Switzerland, at a subsidiary of the company located in the canton of Schaffhausen.
Contrasting Reactions in Defense Circles
Opinions differ among military circles. Stefan Holenstein, president of the Association of Swiss Military Companies, is very critical of this choice. He questions the decision to choose the lowest-rated model and expresses concern, especially since he will have to use this weapon himself.
On the other hand, Alexandre Vautravers, editor-in-chief of the Swiss Military Review, defends the decision as primarily strategic.
Discussions to Come in Parliament
Parliament will still need to approve this acquisition as part of the 2026 army message.
In any case, Charles Juillard, a Jurassian senator from the Center, downplays the observed flaws. He explains, “The flaws that have been identified are real. However, this was based on weapons produced in American production chains, while the weapon that will equip the Swiss army will be produced in Swiss chains.”
From the left, concerns persist nonetheless. Green national councilor Clarence Chollet from Neuchâtel laments a lack of clarity on planned corrections and their cost. She emphasizes, “We can’t get a very precise answer on how it will be corrected and especially at what price.”
Debates will begin during the summer session.
Source: Mathieu Henderson / juma
