At the abbey of Vaux-de-Cernay near Rambouillet in the Yvelines region, the foreign ministers of the G7 countries sent a clear message to Washington: the American strategy in the war between Iran, Israel, and the United States must be clarified.
At the heart of the debates, the American Secretary of State was asked to explain a line that several chancelleries deemed “unreadable.” In response to criticism, Marco Rubio defended the American position confidently, stating that the United States could achieve its military objectives “within the next two weeks,” promising an unprecedented weakening of Iran. “When we are done with the Iranians, they will be more weakened than they have been in recent history.”
The US Secretary of State emphasized that this strategy could be carried out without the deployment of ground troops, while alluding to the possibility of military reinforcement in the region.
Marco Rubio also mentioned a clear priority: American interests above all. Washington could redirect certain military resources originally intended for other war zones, including Ukraine.
The Strait of Hormuz Issue
The American Secretary of State delivered an offensive speech regarding the international community. According to him, the criticisms against the American action are unjustified. “I think that countries worldwide, even those who complain a bit about this situation, should actually be grateful that the United States has a president ready to face a threat like this,” he said.
He took the opportunity to advise countries concerned about international law to “take their responsibilities” and “react” to the threat posed by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. According to a source cited by Axios, Marco Rubio said that “the United States would need us in the next phase to escort ships or simply to ensure an international presence in the Strait of Hormuz, to show the Iranians that they do not control the strait.” “Everyone agreed,” she added.
Dubious Allies
Despite these statements, several G7 members expressed their concern. They called for an immediate halt to attacks on civilians and infrastructure and an urgent clarification of the American strategy. This diplomatic pressure reflects a growing unease in the face of an escalating and entrenched war, the consequences of which now extend far beyond the Middle East.
While Marco Rubio displays full confidence in the outcome of the conflict, his statements leave many areas of ambiguity. No precise schedule of operations has been detailed, and the final objectives remain unclear. In a context of extreme tensions and military escalation, this ambiguity fuels concerns among allies and international financial markets.
