While forty (at least…) candidates, ranging from socialists to republicans, compete for the votes of all the most reasonable voters, France is preparing to experience a duel in the second round of the 2027 presidential election between the candidate of La France insoumise and that of the National Rally. We know in advance that they will both enter the campaign fueled by the hatred of all those who have governed France for 50 years. We also know in advance that they will explain (rightly) that a large part of the country’s problems come from the lack of competence, preparation, program, courage, action and long-term vision of their predecessors. If one of the two wins, and this is most likely, he or she, given their programs, their personalities, their political support and their characters, will demonstrate the same lack of courage, the same inaction, the same incompetence, the same unpreparedness, same lack of long-term vision as their predecessors. Even if they will dress this up in a language of renewal, with all the necessary portmanteau words: “start”, “national recovery”, “put an end to waste”, “restore social justice”, “restore pride to France”. And even if they will both display programs, figures, and an impressive list of supporters and more or less self-proclaimed experts.
The similarity between these two extreme parties is not limited to that. It is much deeper. It finds its origin in what in fact seems to oppose them most head-on: their conceptions of France.
For the RN, France is today in great danger of losing its identity, invaded by hordes of Muslims and blacks, coming from Africa and the Middle East, who are organizing the great replacement of the people of France, imposing foreign cultures, customs, religions and languages, making Islamist banditry and vandalism reign there. generalized, imposing sharia and the veil, and destroying secularism, the cement of the Republic We find in this sense a thousand declarations from its leaders: one among others from Jordan Bardella: “Our country is undergoing an unsustainable migratory submersion. What threatens us, if we continue on this path, is. the breakup of France as we know it.”
For LFI, in the opposite direction, it is a chance to see France regain demographic vitality, thanks to foreigners from its former colonies, who will “creolize” it, give it new energy, allow it to be more attentive to the suffering of the countries of the South, and in particular the former French colonies, and Palestine, thus forging new alliances with the most dynamic peoples of the world. We find a thousand declarations to this effect from its leaders. One among others by Jean-Luc Mélenchon: “Our France is a creolized, mixed France. A new France made up of all those who want to live together.”
Nothing, a priori, is more dissimilar than these two points of view. In reality, they agree on the essentials: For both, France must only think about its identity and its sovereignty. For both, mixing with other European peoples is unacceptable. For both, the European project is diabolical. For both, a common, European sovereignty, ultimately even inventing a continental nationality, is a horror. For both, the only European country that is more or less frequentable is our big neighbor to the East, Russia. For both, the future of France must therefore be decided by the French alone, outside of any influence from third countries. Proof? Marine Le Pen, Jordan Bardella, and Jean-Luc Mélenchon all three said, word for word: “European rules cannot be imposed against the will of the French people.”
However, the key to France’s survival, in the face of all the enemies that surround it, is on the contrary the strengthening of the European Union; and the application of all its rules, even those decided by a majority of European countries of which we are not a part, in particular in accordance with article 52 of our constitution, which affirms the superiority of treaties over laws.
This common hatred of the European Union (whether it is hidden for one in the search for an ethnic purification of identity, and for the other in the apology of an openness to all the winds of the South) constitutes the most deadly collusion that could await France in 2027. Whichever of the two is then in power, solidarity will end. continental budgetary, with industrial integration, with common protection of our borders, with common defense, with the common agricultural policy, with community preference in a very large number of sectors. This program, which is common to them, is exactly what our competitors, or enemies, Russians, Americans or Chinese, dream of. We must therefore expect that all the chancelleries, all the social networks, all the agencies of influence in these three countries will combine all their efforts to have Mr. Mélenchon, Madame Le Pen or Mr. Bardella elected. To the great misfortune of France.
Â
