<!–
Digital Markets Act : la défense d’Apple en faveur de Google face à l’Europe
–>
In an unexpected turnaround, Apple is positioning itself to support Google in its confrontation with the European Union regarding the Digital Markets Act (DMA). While the two technology giants are traditionally rivals, this temporary alliance against European regulations raises essential questions about data protection and the interoperability of operating systems. Why is Apple choosing to defend its competitor, and what implications might this have for the future of mobile technology?
The main thing to remember
- Apple opposes the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, which aims to force Google to open up Android to its competitors.
- Apple’s defensive stance against Google could be linked to similar fears about its own ecosystem, notably Siri.
- Apple criticizes the European Commission for its hasty approach and lack of expertise in reviewing operating systems.
The Digital Markets Act and its implications for Google
The Digital Markets Act, proposed by the European Union, is designed to limit the power of large technology companies by promoting greater competition. This text demands that Google allow competing AI chatbots to access Android features. According to the project, Google should also share its search data anonymously with its rivals. These measures aim to create a more level playing field for emerging companies, but they raise concerns about the security and privacy of users.
Why does Apple support Google?
Apple recently took a stand alongside Google, stressing that the new European rules could compromise user security and device integrity. This defense may seem surprising given the historical rivalry between the two companies, but it can be explained by common concerns. Apple fears that the same openness requirements will be imposed on its own operating system, which would jeopardize its strategy of data protection and control of the ecosystem.
Apple’s criticism of the European Commission
In its contribution to the European Commission, Apple does not hesitate to criticize Brussels’ working method. The Cupertino company criticizes the European Union for wanting to dictate the design of operating systems without sufficient knowledge of the subject, based on work deemed insufficient. This position shows Apple’s determination to protect its economic model and its innovations in the face of regulatory decisions that it considers ill-founded.
Potential consequences for the technology industry
Apple’s position in this matter could have significant repercussions for the technology industry. If Google chooses to comply with European requirements, it could set a precedent that forces other companies to open up their systems. On the other hand, if Google resists, it could lead to a prolonged confrontation with the European Union, with significant financial implications.
Towards a Siri and Gemini collaboration?
An interesting aspect of this temporary alliance between Apple and Google is the potential partnership around Siri and Gemini. As AI continues to evolve, a collaboration between these two giants could lead to significant innovations in the field of voice assistants. This synergy could help improve the efficiency and capabilities of digital assistants, thus meeting the growing expectations of users.
Interoperability challenges in the technology sector
The Apple-Google affair highlights a broader issue in the technology sector: interoperability. As regulators seek to encourage greater openness, technology companies must strike a balance between innovation, security and compliance with regulations. Companies like Microsoft and Amazon also face these challenges, seeking to protect their innovations while complying with legal requirements.
In 2026, the question of interoperability remains crucial for the future of the technology industry. Businesses must navigate an evolving regulatory landscape, which could reshape how technologies are developed and used globally.






/2026/05/07/69fc5dcf009ec251378344.jpg)
