The film about Michael Jackson’s life simply narrates the events that led him to become the greatest showman in the world. After controversy before its release and a tumultuous filming process, the Michael Jackson biopic finally hits screens. While it depicts the rise of the King of Pop, it avoids delving too deeply into his downfall.
Elton John, Bruce Springsteen, Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Bob Marley, Amy Winehouse, Freddie Mercury, even Robbie Williams, and soon The Beatles – the number of biopics released to date is uncountable. These films fill theatres, mostly successful, aiming to offer their actors prestigious awards for the best imitation.
A Quest for Freedom
Michael is portrayed as a pure-hearted child, tormented by an abusive father who belittles and mistreats him, even going so far as to call him “big nose,” leading the artist, as an adult, to undergo a rhinoplasty procedure. As time passes and the Jackson family’s success peaks, turning the working-class family into wealthy figures in the late 1960s, Michael, now an adult, dreams of spreading his wings.
A Portrait a bit too Well-Painted
The unease provoked by viewing “Michael” applies here. The narrative seems hagiographic, portraying Jackson as a saint – loving animals that would become his only friends, exceptionally kind with unconditional love for his fans, children, and the wounded, seen as a being of extraordinary sensitivity, driven by the desire to make the world a better place.
The Music, That Music
Whether you love or hate Antoine Fuqua’s approach, it’s hard not to groove to the film’s opening notes that kick off with “Wanna Be Startin’ Somethin’.” Despite artificial direction, viewers are still impressed by Jaafar Jackson’s portrayal of his uncle Michael, exhibiting incredible mimicry. Special mention to young Juliano Krue Valdi, who portrays a particularly endearing young Michael. Notably absent is Janet Jackson, Michael’s sister, whose existence isn’t even mentioned. She refused to participate in the film. This absence reminds us that we face a work of fiction.
The film, primarily aimed at fans, will only further galvanize their faith in their idol. Detractors will see it as a facade refurbishment. Yet, watching the film objectively reveals nuances and the beginning of a man’s decline – one whose childhood was stolen and exhibits many unmistakable neurodivergent traits.
